The narrative of homicide in Baltimore is a complex, fifty-year saga of cyclical crises, policy shifts, and socio-economic turmoil. The city’s struggle with violence is not a recent development but a persistent challenge, with each decade defined by distinct public health epidemics, policing philosophies, and community responses. Understanding this historical arc is essential to contextualizing the city’s current public safety landscape and evaluating the potential for sustained progress.

1970s: A City in Crisis — Over 300 Murders Annually by Mid-Decade

The 1970s marked a pivotal and violent turning point for Baltimore. The decade began with 231 homicides in 1970, a number that would soon seem modest. By 1971, the city recorded 323 murders, followed by a peak of 330 in 1972.1 This surge represented the city’s first sustained period of recording more than 300 homicides annually, a grim benchmark that would reappear in subsequent decades. While the numbers fluctuated, dropping to 200 in 1976 and 171 in 1977, the violence of the early decade established a new, higher baseline for lethal violence.1

This spike was not a random aberration but a direct consequence of a national public health crisis: the widespread influx of cheap and potent heroin from Mexico and other international sources.2 As addiction spread, it fueled a volatile and violent illicit market. The data from the Baltimore City Police Department’s official Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) records provides a granular, year-by-year confirmation of this trend, showing a dramatic escalation in killings that coincided with the drug epidemic’s onset.1 The crisis of the 1970s forged a durable link between the narcotics trade, addiction, and homicide—a pattern that would define the city’s public safety challenges for generations. It demonstrated with stark clarity how a public health failure could rapidly manifest as a public safety catastrophe, suggesting that a response focused solely on law enforcement, without addressing the root causes of addiction and the economics of the drug trade, would prove insufficient.

1990: Peak of the Crime Wave — 305 Murders (~47 per 100,000)

The 1990s saw the violence that began in the 1970s reach its devastating apex. The year 1990 served as a key marker in this period, with 305 homicides recorded, equivalent to a rate of 41.4 per 100,000 residents based on the city’s population of 736,014 at the time.1 This, however, was not the peak. The violence continued to escalate, reaching 335 homicides in 1992 and culminating in 1993 with 353 homicides—the highest number ever recorded in the city’s history.1 The per capita rate in 1993 reached an unprecedented 48.2 per 100,000.2 Throughout the decade, the city consistently recorded over 300 homicides annually, cementing its national reputation as a city grappling with an intractable violence problem.1

This era was dominated by the crack cocaine epidemic, which, much like the heroin crisis two decades prior, unleashed a new and even more violent wave of market-driven conflict across urban America. The sustained high body count of this period did more than set statistical records; it fundamentally altered the city’s political landscape and its approach to policing. The immense public fear and political pressure born from years of record-breaking violence created the conditions for the adoption of “zero-tolerance” and mass-arrest strategies that would characterize law enforcement in the subsequent decade.5 The trauma inflicted on communities and the deep erosion of police-community relations during this era would have lasting consequences, contributing to a legacy of mistrust that would complicate public safety efforts for years to come.

2000s: A Crime Collapse — Fewer Than 250 Murders Annually

Following the intense violence of the 1990s, the 2000s brought a period of significant, albeit inconsistent, decline. The decade began with a notable drop from 305 homicides in 1999 to 261 in 2000.1 While the annual total remained stubbornly high for several years—exceeding 250 each year from 2000 to 2007—the latter part of the decade showed substantial progress. Homicides fell to 234 in 2008 and 238 in 2009, marking the first time since the mid-1980s that the city had recorded consecutive years with fewer than 250 killings.2

This “crime collapse” was part of a broader, nationwide trend of falling crime rates.6 While local policing strategies were often credited with the improvement, the powerful tailwind of the national decline was an undeniable factor. This period offered a much-needed reprieve from the relentless 300-plus homicide years of the previous decade. However, the progress proved to be fragile. Because the decline was largely part of a national phenomenon rather than the result of resolving Baltimore’s unique, deep-seated systemic issues—such as concentrated poverty, blight, and intergenerational trauma—the city remained highly vulnerable to a resurgence in violence. The 2000s can be seen not as a cure for the city’s violence, but as a remission. The failure to use this period of relative calm to fundamentally alter the root causes of violence set the stage for the catastrophic increase that would follow a decade later.

2010–2019: Continued Decline with Stability

The 2010s were a decade of two starkly contrasting halves, encapsulating both a historic achievement and a catastrophic collapse in public safety. The decade began on a hopeful note, as Baltimore achieved a significant milestone in 2011 by recording 196 homicides. It was the first time the city’s annual total had fallen below 200 since 1978, a success attributed to a sustained focus on repeat violent offenders and increased community engagement.2

This progress, however, was tragically short-lived. In April 2015, the death of Freddie Gray while in police custody ignited widespread civil unrest and fundamentally ruptured the already-tenuous relationship between the community and the police department. The aftermath saw a documented pullback in proactive policing and a collapse of community cooperation.2 The consequences were immediate and devastating. Homicides surged by 63% in a single year, jumping from 211 in 2014 to 344 in 2015.2 This event marked the beginning of Baltimore’s modern homicide crisis. For the next eight consecutive years, the city would not see a year with fewer than 300 homicides. The decade closed with 348 killings in 2019, the second-deadliest year on record by raw count and, due to a smaller population, the highest per capita homicide rate in the city’s history at that time.2 The 2015 spike serves as a critical case study in the sociology of policing, revealing that police legitimacy is not a peripheral concern but a core component of public safety infrastructure. When that legitimacy evaporates, the social contract between the state and its citizens is broken, and violence can rapidly fill the vacuum.

2020–2021: Pandemic Surge Reverses Decade of Progress

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 did little to quell Baltimore’s homicide crisis. While much of public life ground to a halt and many other forms of crime saw declines due to lockdowns, lethal violence continued unabated.8 The city recorded 335 homicides in 2020 and 337 in 2021, maintaining the alarmingly high rates of 57.1 and 58.3 per 100,000, respectively.2

This period highlighted the deeply entrenched nature of the city’s violence. The pandemic disrupted schools, social services, and community-based violence interruption efforts, while simultaneously inflicting immense economic and psychological stress on already-vulnerable populations. Yet, the core drivers of homicide persisted. This dynamic acted as an unintentional control experiment, demonstrating that Baltimore’s homicides are not primarily driven by random street crime or crimes of opportunity, which decreased during this period. Instead, the data suggests that the violence is a product of specific, insular social networks and interpersonal conflicts that are largely insulated from broader societal shifts. An analysis of violence in the city’s Western District found that the vast majority of homicides stemmed from disputes involving a small, known population of criminally active groups.10 This understanding, solidified during the pandemic years, would become the cornerstone of the city’s subsequent, more targeted violence reduction strategy.

2022–2024: Modest Recovery and Cautious Optimism

After another year of extreme violence in 2022, with 333 homicides, Baltimore began to experience a dramatic and historic reversal.2 In 2023, the city recorded 261 homicides, a 20% decrease from the previous year and the largest single-year drop in its history.11 The progress accelerated in 2024, with the year-end total falling another 23% to 201 homicides—the lowest number since the 2011 achievement.2 The per capita homicide rate plummeted from a peak of 58.4 in 2022 to 34.3 in 2024.2

This turnaround is directly credited to the full-scale implementation of Mayor Brandon Scott’s Comprehensive Violence Prevention Plan and its flagship initiative, the Group Violence Reduction Strategy (GVRS).5 The strategy was piloted in the city’s most violent police district, the Western District, in early 2022. An independent, external evaluation by researchers from the University of Pennsylvania and Cornell University confirmed that the strategy was the direct cause of a roughly one-third reduction in homicides and non-fatal shootings in the pilot area, without displacing violence to other neighborhoods.13 The historic citywide declines in 2023 and 2024 have closely tracked the expansion of this data-driven, focused strategy to other police districts.13 This period represents a potential paradigm shift, providing the first empirically validated evidence that a locally implemented strategy can successfully and significantly reduce violence in Baltimore.

Homicides Over the Last 10 Years

The past decade, from 2015 to 2024, encapsulates Baltimore’s modern homicide crisis in its entirety—from its violent onset to the recent, promising recovery. The decade began on the precipice of disaster, with the city having recorded 211 homicides in 2014, a figure near a multi-decade low.2 The events of 2015 shattered that progress, as killings surged to 344, establishing a tragic new baseline that would hold for eight consecutive years.2 This period, from 2015 through 2022, represents the most sustained stretch of extreme lethal violence in the city’s history, with annual totals consistently exceeding 300.

The dramatic, back-to-back declines in 2023 and 2024 mark a significant break from this devastating trend. The reduction to 201 homicides in 2024 brought the city back to a level of violence not seen since before the 2015 unrest, effectively erasing the “Freddie Gray effect” on the city’s homicide count. This ten-year arc, detailed in Table 1, highlights both the fragility of public safety and the profound, long-lasting impact of a crisis in police legitimacy.

Baltimore Homicides, Population, and Homicide Rate per 100,000 (2015–2024)

Year	Total Homicides	Estimated Population	Homicide Rate per 100,000
2015	344	622,454	55.4
2016	318	621,000	51.4
2017	343	619,796	55.9
2018	309	614,700	51.0
2019	348	609,032	58.3
2020	335	585,708	57.1
2021	337	592,211	58.3
2022	333	584,548	58.4
2023	261	577,193	46.0
2024	201	568,271	34.3

Sources: Homicide totals and rates are compiled from Wikipedia’s aggregation of official data.2 Population figures are from the U.S. Census Bureau and FRED Economic Data.15 Note: Rates may vary slightly across sources due to different population estimates.

Last Five Years in Focus – 2020-2025 Murders

A more granular examination of the last five years reveals a clear narrative of crisis, strategic intervention, and recovery. This period saw the continuation of extreme violence through the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by a historic, strategy-driven reduction in homicides.

2020–2021: A Disrupted City Faces a Murder Spike

The years 2020 and 2021 were defined by the continuation of the post-2015 homicide crisis, compounded by the unprecedented social and economic disruption of the COVID-19 pandemic. Baltimore recorded 335 homicides in 2020 and 337 in 2021, with per capita rates of 57.1 and 58.3, respectively.2 This occurred even as many other forms of crime declined due to public health restrictions.9 This period was marked by the election of Mayor Brandon Scott in late 2020, who ran on a platform to treat violence as a public health issue and move away from the “broken zero-tolerance strategies of the past”.17 During this time, his administration began the intensive work of designing and building the infrastructure for the city’s first-ever Comprehensive Violence Prevention Plan, which would be officially launched in 2021.5

2022–2024: Signs of Stability and Targeted Recovery

This period marks the tangible results of the city’s strategic shift. After a final year of high violence in 2022 (333 homicides), the city implemented its Group Violence Reduction Strategy (GVRS) and began to see immediate results.2 The strategy is a focused deterrence model that identifies the small number of individuals most at risk of shooting someone or being shot and provides a coordinated response from law enforcement, social service providers, and community partners. These individuals are offered intensive support—including job training, housing assistance, and counseling—to help them leave a life of violence. Simultaneously, they are put on notice that continued violence will result in swift and certain sanctions from law enforcement.5

The strategy’s success is not merely anecdotal. An independent evaluation confirmed that the GVRS pilot in the Western District directly caused a significant reduction in gun violence.13 As the strategy was expanded to other districts in 2023 and 2024, the city experienced historic, back-to-back declines in homicides, falling to 261 and 201, respectively.2 Mid-year data from 2025 indicates that this downward trend is continuing, with homicides down 22% compared to the first half of 2024.19

Why Is Baltimore’s Murder Rate Still a Concern?

Despite the significant and encouraging progress of the last two years, Baltimore’s homicide rate remains a major concern. The recent successes have been achieved through intensive, targeted strategies, but the deep-rooted, systemic drivers of violence persist. These underlying factors make the city’s progress fragile and vulnerable to reversal without sustained effort and investment.

Gang Activity and Neighborhood Conflict

A primary driver of lethal violence in Baltimore is not random crime but targeted conflict between specific, often hyperlocal, groups and crews. A 2024 Baltimore Police Department analysis of violence in the Western District provided a stark illustration of this dynamic. The analysis revealed that approximately 75% of all gun violence was related to individuals involved with criminally active groups, and 72% of homicides stemmed from interpersonal disputes involving members of these groups.10 These groups—which include gangs, drug trafficking organizations, and robbery crews—were estimated to comprise only 2% of the district’s population but were connected to a vast majority of its violence.10 This finding is crucial because it refutes the misconception of violence as a widespread, random phenomenon. Instead, it diagnoses the problem as one of concentrated conflict within specific, identifiable social networks. This understanding is precisely why the Group Violence Reduction Strategy, which surgically targets these high-risk individuals and groups, has proven effective where broader, less-focused policing strategies have failed.

Influx of Illegal Firearms from Other States

Baltimore’s ability to control violence is severely undermined by a constant influx of illegal firearms from states with weaker gun laws. Despite having some of the strongest gun regulations in the nation, Maryland is a top destination for gun traffickers, a phenomenon often referred to as the “iron pipeline”.20 The data is compelling: according to testimony related to state legislation, Maryland has one of the highest rates of out-of-state crime gun imports in the country. In 2020 alone, 55.2% of the 6,357 firearms traced by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) in Maryland originated from outside the state.20 Another analysis cited in the same testimony found that as many as two-thirds of all guns recovered in crimes in Maryland are traced to out-of-state sources.20 This steady supply of illegal weapons provides the fuel for the city’s violent conflicts and places an immense burden on local law enforcement. It also reframes the issue from a purely local crime problem to one of interstate commerce and federal policy, suggesting that a sustainable, long-term solution will require federal action to curb illegal trafficking and straw purchasing.

Low Clearance Rates in Some Districts

For years, a chronically low homicide clearance rate plagued the Baltimore Police Department, eroding community trust and perpetuating cycles of retaliatory “street justice.” When murders go unsolved, it sends a message that violence carries few consequences, emboldening offenders and leaving communities feeling unprotected. Between 2013 and 2023, a staggering 1,809 of the city’s 2,925 homicides went unsolved, for a clearance rate of just 38% over that decade.21

However, this has been an area of dramatic improvement. Coinciding with strategic reforms such as the consolidation of detective units, the BPD’s homicide clearance rate has risen sharply, from 40.3% in 2020 to 68% in 2024.12 The mid-year rate for 2025 stood at 64%.19 This rise is not merely a consequence of having fewer murders to investigate; it is a critical driver of violence reduction itself. A higher clearance rate demonstrates competence, delivers a measure of justice to victims’ families, and rebuilds social capital with the community. By showing that the official justice system can be effective, it disrupts the logic of retaliation, creating a positive feedback loop where solved cases encourage more community cooperation, which in turn leads to more solved cases.

Legacy of Systemic Disinvestment

The geographic distribution of violence in Baltimore today is not random; it is a direct and predictable outcome of historical, race-based government policies. A groundbreaking 2024 study published in PMC established a direct, statistically significant link between the 1930s federal housing policy of “redlining” and contemporary rates of firearm injury in the city.23 The analysis found that for every one-unit increase in a neighborhood’s historical redlining score—a measure of its perceived investment risk, which was heavily based on its racial makeup—there is a 2.24-fold increase in the rate of firearm injuries today.23

These redlined neighborhoods, overwhelmingly Black, were systematically starved of public and private investment for generations. This policy-driven disinvestment led directly to the conditions that correlate strongly with violence: concentrated poverty, high vacancy rates, population decline, and lack of economic opportunity.24 This research provides empirical proof that the map of violence in 21st-century Baltimore is a ghost of the 1930s redlining map. This understanding elevates the conversation about public safety beyond policing tactics to include restorative justice and equitable economic development. It makes a powerful, data-driven case that the most effective long-term public safety program is a plan for massive, sustained investment in the very communities that were historically harmed.

Economic and Mental Health Disparities

Violence in Baltimore is inextricably linked to public health, particularly the intersecting crises of trauma and mental health. A staggering 30% of children in the city have experienced two or more Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), such as witnessing domestic or neighborhood violence.26 This pervasive exposure to violence is a powerful driver of trauma. Studies have shown that residents of violent “hot spots” suffer from significantly higher rates of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).27

This creates a devastating cycle where individuals, particularly young men, are caught in a loop of victimization, trauma, and retaliation.29 This dynamic complicates the traditional law enforcement narrative by framing many individuals involved in violence as both perpetrators and victims. It suggests that a purely punitive approach is insufficient because it fails to address the underlying trauma that drives violent behavior. Recognizing this, the city has begun to integrate a public health approach, including efforts to divert certain 911 calls from a police response to a behavioral health response.30 This acknowledges that you cannot arrest your way out of a trauma epidemic; sustainable violence reduction requires integrating trauma-informed care and mental health services as a core component of public safety strategy.

Geographic Breakdown: Baltimore Neighborhoods With the Highest Homicides

A defining feature of homicide in Baltimore is its intense geographic concentration. A 2016 investigation found that approximately 80% of the city’s gun homicides occurred in just 25% of its neighborhoods.2 This pattern persists today, with a handful of communities—many of which align with the historically redlined areas of West, South, and East Baltimore—bearing a disproportionate burden of the violence. The following analysis uses 2023 data from the Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance (BNIA) to verify and specify the homicide rates in some of the city’s most affected areas.

Homicide and Violent Crime Metrics for Selected Baltimore Neighborhoods – 2023- 2024 Data

Neighborhood (Police District)	Gun-Related Homicides per 1,000	Calculated Homicide Rate per 100,000	Violent Crime Rate per 1,000
Sandtown-Winchester/Harlem Park (West)	0.9	90	32.3
Upton/Druid Heights (West)	0.9	90	34.1
Cherry Hill (South)	0.7	70	17.6
Park Heights (Northwest)	N/A	~45 (Est.)	N/A
Belair-Edison (Northeast)	0.3	30	15.9

Sources: Data is from the Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance (BNIA) Vital Signs 23 report.31 Rates per 100,000 are calculated from the BNIA per 1,000 metric. The Park Heights estimate is based on historical data and partial 2023 reports.

Sandtown-Winchester (West Baltimore): ~90 per 100,000

According to 2023 BNIA data, the Sandtown-Winchester/Harlem Park community statistical area (CSA) recorded 0.9 gun-related homicides per 1,000 residents.31 This translates to an exceptionally high rate of 90 per 100,000, far exceeding the citywide average and significantly higher than the initial estimate of ~55. This West Baltimore neighborhood, which was the epicenter of the 2015 unrest, also suffers from a high violent crime rate of 32.3 per 1,000 residents.31

Cherry Hill (South Baltimore): ~70 per 100,000

The South Baltimore neighborhood of Cherry Hill recorded 0.7 gun-related homicides per 1,000 residents in 2023.34 This is equivalent to a rate of 70 per 100,000, a figure substantially higher than the initial estimate of ~48. While the neighborhood’s overall Part 1 crime rate is not the highest in the city, its rate of lethal violence remains among the most severe.35

Park Heights (Northwest Baltimore): ~45 per 100,000

Precise 2023 gun homicide data for the entire Park Heights area is not available in a single metric within the provided data. Historically, the area has been ranked by police as having one of the highest per capita crime rates in the city.36 The Southern Park Heights CSA had a Part 1 crime rate of 63.6 per 1,000 in 2023, while the broader Northwest police district reported multiple homicides during the year.35 Given these factors and historical context, the estimated rate of ~45 per 100,000 remains a plausible, though unverified, figure for the broader neighborhood.

Belair-Edison (Northeast Baltimore): ~30 per 100,000

In 2023, the Belair-Edison CSA had a gun-related homicide rate of 0.3 per 1,000 residents.34 This translates to a rate of 30 per 100,000, which is lower than the initial estimate of ~40 but still considerably higher than the national average. The neighborhood’s overall violent crime rate was 15.9 per 1,000 residents.32

Upton and Druid Heights: ~90 per 100,000

The Upton/Druid Heights CSA in West Baltimore recorded 0.9 gun-related homicides per 1,000 residents in 2023, the same as Sandtown-Winchester.33 This rate of 90 per 100,000 is more than double the initial estimate of ~38 and places it among the most violent areas in the city. The neighborhood also suffers from one of the city’s highest violent crime rates (34.1 per 1,000 residents) and the single highest rate of narcotics-related calls for service, highlighting the deep intersection of the drug trade and violence.33

Baltimore vs. Other Major U.S. Cities

To fully contextualize Baltimore’s struggle with violence, it is necessary to compare its homicide rate with those of other major U.S. cities. For decades, Baltimore has consistently ranked among the most violent large cities in the nation on a per capita basis. While a city like Chicago often records a higher absolute number of homicides, Baltimore’s smaller population frequently results in a higher rate of killing per resident.

Even with its recent historic declines, Baltimore remains a national outlier. In 2023, analyses consistently placed Baltimore city among the large urban areas with the highest homicide rates, alongside New Orleans, Memphis, and St. Louis.39 FBI data from 2024, as shown in Table 3, provides a clear comparison, ranking Baltimore fourth among major cities with populations over 100,000. This national context is crucial: it underscores the severity of Baltimore’s challenge while also demonstrating that other American cities face similar, and in some cases more severe, crises of lethal violence.

Table 3: Homicide Rate Comparison, Baltimore vs. Other Major U.S. Cities (2024 FBI Data)

City	Homicides per 100,000 Residents
Birmingham, AL	58.8
St. Louis, MO	45.0
Memphis, TN	40.6
Baltimore, MD	34.8
Detroit, MI	31.2
Cleveland, OH	30.0
Dayton, OH	29.7
Kansas City, MO	27.6

Source: Newsweek analysis of FBI Uniform Crime Reporting data for 2024.40

Forecast: What Lies Ahead for Baltimore in 2025 and Beyond?

The public safety forecast for Baltimore is one of cautious but evidence-based optimism. The city has, for the first time in its modern history, identified, implemented, and scaled a violence reduction strategy—the GVRS—that has been independently and empirically validated as a direct cause of a significant decline in homicides.13 The continued double-digit reductions in killings and shootings through the first half of 2025 suggest that the successes of 2023 and 2024 were not a statistical anomaly but the result of a deliberate, functioning, and sustainable strategy.19 This progress is further reinforced by institutional improvements within the Baltimore Police Department, most notably the dramatic rise in the homicide clearance rate, which helps rebuild community trust and disrupt cycles of retaliation.12

However, the path forward is fraught with challenges. The city’s recent strategic successes have been achieved against a backdrop of deeply entrenched systemic problems that will take decades, if not generations, to fully resolve. The legacy of systemic disinvestment and racial segregation continues to fuel the conditions of poverty, trauma, and hopelessness in which violence thrives.23 The constant, unabated flow of illegal firearms from states with weaker gun laws represents a major external threat that local policy alone cannot mitigate.20

Sustaining the current progress will require a dual focus. In the short term, the city must maintain the integrity and focus of the Group Violence Reduction Strategy. This demands consistent political will, dedicated funding, and robust inter-agency coordination between police, prosecutors, service providers, and community partners.13 Any wavering in this commitment risks a return to the chaotic and violent equilibrium that defined the city from 2015 to 2022.

In the long term, a durable peace will only be achieved by addressing the root causes of violence. This requires pursuing the difficult, resource-intensive work of rebuilding the communities most impacted by historical trauma and disinvestment. The data clearly shows that violence is a symptom of these deeper structural failures. Therefore, the most effective long-range public safety plan for Baltimore is one centered on equitable economic development, housing stability, and accessible public health services. The city has found a viable strategy to manage the symptoms of violence; the ultimate challenge will be to cure the underlying disease.

Works cited

1. Homicide – Baltimore Police History, accessed October 26, 2025, https://baltimorepolicemuseum.com/en/politics-diplomacy/397-homicide
2. Crime in Baltimore – Wikipedia, accessed October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Baltimore
3. Uniform Crime Reports of Baltimore Ci and Index from 1985 to 2005 – The Disaster Center, accessed October 26, 2025, https://www.disastercenter.com/maryland/crime/4850.htm
4. Baltimore reports historic drop in homicide rates, with April hitting all-time low – CBS News, accessed October 26, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/maryland-baltimore-city-violent-crime-homicides/
5. Brandon Scott’s Fight Against Violence in Baltimore Isn’t Over, accessed October 26, 2025, https://www.thetrace.org/2025/09/brandon-scott-baltimore-violence-safety/
6. Which US states have the highest murder rates? – USAFacts, accessed October 26, 2025, https://usafacts.org/articles/which-states-have-the-highest-murder-rates/
7. Baltimore MD Murder/Homicide Rate 2000-2018 – Macrotrends, accessed October 26, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/cities/us/md/baltimore/murder-homicide-rate-statistics
8. 2020 Uniform Crime Report – Maryland State Police, accessed October 26, 2025, https://mdsp.maryland.gov/Document%20Downloads/Crime%20In%20Maryland%202020%20Uniform%20Crime%20Report.pdf
9. Exploring the Impacts of COVID-19 on Baltimore’s Neighborhoods, accessed October 26, 2025, https://coronavirus-bniajfi.hub.arcgis.com/
10. Reducing Gun Violence in Baltimore Summary – ASU Center for Problem-Oriented Policing, accessed October 26, 2025, https://popcenter.asu.edu/sites/g/files/litvpz3631/files/baltimore_pd_reducing_gun_violence_in_baltimore_2024.pdf
11. Mayor Scott, City of Baltimore Mark Historic Violence Reductions, accessed October 26, 2025, https://mayor.baltimorecity.gov/news/press-releases/2025-01-08-mayor-scott-city-baltimore-mark-historic-violence-reductions
12. Baltimore Police Department releases 2024 Year-End Crime Report and Key Highlights, accessed October 26, 2025, https://www.baltimorepolice.org/news/baltimore-police-department-releases-2024-year-end-crime-report-and-key-highlights
13. What’s Behind Baltimore’s Drastic Reduction in Violence – Vital City, accessed October 26, 2025, https://www.vitalcitynyc.org/articles/whats-behind-baltimores-drastic-reduction-in-violence
14. Baltimore Witness Report: Is the City’s Group Violence Reduction …, accessed October 26, 2025, https://baltimorewitness.org/baltimore-witness-report-is-the-citys-group-violence-reduction-strategy-keeping-crime-low/
15. Table Data – Population Estimate, Total (5-year estimate) in Baltimore city, MD – FRED, accessed October 26, 2025, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/B03002001E024510
16. Baltimore – Wikipedia, accessed October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltimore
17. Results — Mayor Brandon Scott for Baltimore, accessed October 26, 2025, https://www.brandonforbaltimore.com/results
18. GROUP VIOLENCE REDUCTION STRATEGY – Crime and Justice Policy Lab, accessed October 26, 2025, https://crimejusticelab.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Penn-Crime-Justice-Policy-Brief_Print-7-Page.pdf
19. Baltimore Police Department releases 2025 Mid-Year Crime Report and key highlights, accessed October 26, 2025, https://www.baltimorepolice.org/news/baltimore-police-department-releases-2025-mid-year-crime-report-and-key-highlights
20. SB443 Trafficking Regulated Firearms – Felony Clas – Maryland, accessed October 26, 2025, https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/cmte_testimony/2025/jpr/25938_02042025_93528-566.pdf
21. Baltimore, MD – Police Scorecard, accessed October 26, 2025, https://policescorecard.org/md/police-department/baltimore
22. Mayor Brandon M. Scott Statement on Continued Decrease in Gun Violence Across Baltimore, accessed October 26, 2025, https://mayor.baltimorecity.gov/news/press-releases/2025-08-01-mayor-brandon-m-scott-statement-continued-decrease-gun-violence
23. Examining the Influence of Historical Redlining on Firearm Injuries …, accessed October 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11230467/
24. How and why did Baltimore of all places become a “dangerous city”? – Reddit, accessed October 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAnAmerican/comments/1cbcon6/how_and_why_did_baltimore_of_all_places_become_a/
25. in the United States and Baltimore Poverty Root Causes of, accessed October 26, 2025, https://www.baltimorehungerproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Root-Causes-of-Poverty.pdf
26. State of Health in Baltimore: White Paper 2017, accessed October 26, 2025, https://health.baltimorecity.gov/state-health-baltimore-winter-2016/state-health-baltimore-white-paper-2017
27. Pathways to Depression: The Impact of Neighborhood Violent Crime on Inner-City Residents in Baltimore, Maryland, USA – NIH, accessed October 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2684449/
28. Mean Streets and Mental Health: Depression and PTSD at Crime Hot Spots – PMC, accessed October 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6394830/
29. Community Violence Intervention | Center for Gun Violence Solutions, accessed October 26, 2025, https://publichealth.jhu.edu/center-for-gun-violence-solutions/solutions/community-violence-intervention
30. City of Baltimore Public Behavioral Health Gap Analysis Implementation Plan DRAFT – PowerDMS, accessed October 26, 2025, https://public.powerdms.com/BALTIMOREMD/documents/943224
31. Vital Signs for Sandtown-Winchester/Harlem Park, accessed October 26, 2025, https://bniajfi.org/community/Sandtown-Winchester_Harlem%20Park/
32. Vital Signs for Belair-Edison, accessed October 26, 2025, https://bniajfi.org/community/Belair-Edison/
33. Vital Signs for Upton/Druid Heights – Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance, accessed October 26, 2025, https://bniajfi.org/community/Upton_Druid%20Heights/
34. Number of Gun-Related Homicides per 1000 Residents – Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance, accessed October 26, 2025, https://bniajfi.org/indicators/Crime%20and%20Safety/gunhom
35. Part 1 Crime Rate per 1000 Residents – Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance, accessed October 26, 2025, https://bniajfi.org/indicators/Crime%20and%20Safety/crime
36. Park Heights, Baltimore – Wikipedia, accessed October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park_Heights,_Baltimore
37. 2023 Ends With Uptick in Homicides, City Remains Under 300 – Baltimore Witness, accessed October 26, 2025, https://baltimorewitness.org/2023-ends-with-uptick-in-homicides-city-remains-under-300/
38. Crime & Safety – ArcGIS StoryMaps, accessed October 26, 2025, https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/6f53fb10a9464026bfc615dc27574f36
39. Which cities have the highest murder rates? – USAFacts, accessed October 26, 2025, https://usafacts.org/articles/which-cities-have-the-highest-murder-rates/
40. Full List of Major Cities With Higher Murder Rates Than Chicago – Newsweek, accessed October 26, 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/major-cities-higher-murder-rates-chicago-2123275
41. Mayor Brandon M. Scott Statement on Continued Homicide and Shooting Reductions, accessed October 26, 2025, https://mayor.baltimorecity.gov/news/press-releases/2025-09-01-mayor-brandon-m-scott-statement-continued-homicide-and-shooting